Modern A/B testing tools show which variant won but leave teams guessing about why behavioral differences occurred.
Build an analysis layer that consumes clickstream data and test configurations, then generates plain-English hypotheses about user psychology behind the results.
Growth teams at mid-market SaaS companies would pay monthly for insights that help generalize winning patterns across tests.
Start by analyzing public A/B test case studies to train the explanation model.
Risk is overpromising causality where only correlation exists.